Possibilities of Interventional Technologies in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast
https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2018-1-3-66-70
Abstract
Purpose: To determinate the accuracy percutaneous methods breast biopsies in the diagnosis of DCIS.
Material and methods: We reviewed a series of 30 women with DCIS who performed breast biopsy under mammographic and ultrasonographic guidance. The biopsy findings were compared with surgical biopsy.
Results: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic alternative to surgical biopsy in patients with noninvasive carcinoma. The accuracy of fine needle aspiration is relatively low. The accuracy for core biopsy was significantly lower than that of vacuum-assisted biopsy (66.7 % versus 96 %).
Conclusion: Rational using imaged-guided breast biopsy allows to determinate strategy of the treatment patients with DCIS.
About the Authors
N. V. PonedelnikovaRussian Federation
Moscow
G. P. Korghenkova
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. S. Karpova
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Ernster V.L., Ballard-Barbash R., Barlow W.E. et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2002. Vol. 94. Р. 1546– 1554.
2. May D.S., Lee N.C., Nadel M.R. et al. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women // Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1998. Vol. 170. Р. 97–104.
3. Desantis C., Siegel R., Bandi P., Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. // CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011. Vol. 61. № 6. Р. 409–418.
4. Badve S.A., Hern R.P., Ward A.V. et al. Prediction of local recurrences of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five histological classifications, a comparative study with long followup // Human Path. 1998. Vol. 29. P. 915–923.
5. Ikeda D.M., Andersson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances // Radiology. 1989. Vol. 172. P. 661–666.
6. Farshid G., Downey P., Gill P.G. Atypical presentations of screendetected DCIS: implications for pre-operative assessment and surgical intervention // Breast. 2007. Vol. 16. P. 161–171.
7. Mitnick J.S., Roses D.F., Harris M.N. et al. Circumscribed intraductal carcinoma of the breast // Radiology. 1989. Vol. 170. P. 423–425.
8. Morrow M. The certainties and the uncertainties of ductal carcinoma in situ // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004. Vol. 96. Р. 424–425.
9. Baxter N.N., Virnig B.A., Durham S.B., Tuttle T.M. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004. Vol. 96. Р. 443–448.
10. Leifland K., Lundquist H., Lagerstedt U. et al. Comparison of preoperative simultaneous stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy and stereotactic core needle biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast // Acta Radiol. 2003. Vol. 44. № 2. P. 213–217.
11. Kirshenbaum K.J., Voruganti T., Overbeeke C. et al. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonplpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device // Amer. J. Roentgenol. 2003. Vol. 182. № 2. P. 527–531.
12. Koskela A.K., Sudah M., Berg M.H. et al. Add-on device for stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: how many biopsy specimens are needed for a reliable diagnosis? // Radiology. 2005. Vol. 236. № 3. P. 801–809.
13. Douglas-Jones A.G., Denson J.L., Cox A.C. et al. Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy // J. Clin. Pathol. 2007. Vol. 60. № 3. P. 295–298.
14. Cawson J.N., Malara F., Kavanagh A. et al. 14-gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars: is excision necessary? // Cancer. 2004. Vol. 100. № 3. P. 652–663.
15. Cho N., Moon W.K., Cha J.H. et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods // Korean J. Radiol. 2005. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 102–109.
16. Liberman L., Smolkin J.H., Dershaw D.D. et al. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy // Radiology. 1998. Vol. 208. P. 251–260.
17. Leifland K., Lagerstedt U., Svane G. Comparison of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in 522 non-palpable breast lesions // Acta Radiol. 2003. Vol. 44. № 4. P. 387–391.
18. Lee C.H., Egglin T.I.K., Philpotts L.E. et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings // Radiology. 1997. Vol. 202. P. 849– 854.
19. Lomoschitz F.M., Helbich T.H., Rudas M. et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy // Radiology. 2004. Vol. 232. № 3. P. 897–903.
20. Wong T.T., Cheung P.S., Ma M.K. et al. Experience of stereotactic breast biopsy using the vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy device and the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation system in Hong Kong women // Asian J. Surg. 2005. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 18– 23.
21. Apestequia L., Mellado M., Saenz J. et al. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotactic table of nonpalpable lesions nonrecognisable by ultrasonography // Eur. Radiol. 2002. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 638–645.
22. Burbank F., Parker S.H. Methods for evaluating the quality of an imaging-guided breast biopsy program // Semin. Breast Disease. 1998. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 71–83.
23. Liberman L., Dershaw D. D., Glassman J. et al. Analysis of cancer not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy // Radiology. 1997. Vol. 203. P. 151–157.
24. Семиглазов В.В. Карцинома in situ молочной железы – морфологические и клинические проблемы // Практич. онкология. 2002. Т. 3. № 1. С. 60–68.
Review
For citations:
Ponedelnikova N.V., Korghenkova G.P., Karpova M.S. Possibilities of Interventional Technologies in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;1(3):66-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2018-1-3-66-70