Tactics of Ultrasound Study in Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications after Hepatobillary Operations of Oncological Patients
https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2018-1-3-39-43
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the tactics of ultrasound studies in the diagnosis of postoperative complications of oncological patients with localization of the disease in the hepatobiliary zone.
Material and methods: 127 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 90 patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma, 34 – gall bladder cancer, 518 people with metastatic liver involvements were examined. For all the patients after the surgical treatment, ultrasound with a dynamic control of the revealed complications was repeatedly performed.
Results: The ultrasound examination influenced the tactics of conducting the postoperative period for 32.3 % of patients with HCC, 31.1 % of patients with HCC, 20.5 % of patients with RVF and 19.9 % of patients with metastatic liver damage. More often complications were found out by US studies if the research was undertaken within first two days and in a week after operation.
Conclusions: Ultrasound diagnostics is a highly effective method for diagnosing postoperative surgical complications, and its results have a decisive influence on the tactics of conducting the postoperative period for patients after surgical treatments of hepatobiliary tumors.
About the Authors
T. Yu. Danzanova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
G. T. Sinyukova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. A. Gudilina
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. N. Sholohov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
P. I. Lepedatu
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
G. F. Allahverdieva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
L. A. Kostyakova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. N. Berdnikov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Wettergren A., Larsen P.N., Rasmussen A. et al. Liver resection over the last decade // Ugeskr. Laeger. 2008. Vol. 170. № 16. P. 1326–1329.
2. Belghiti J., Regimbeau J.M., Durand F. et al. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience on 328 cases // Hepatogastroenterology. 2002. Vol. 49. № 43. P. 41–46.
3. Coelho J.C., Claus C.M., Machuca T.N. Liver resection: 10-year experience from a single institution // Arq. Gastroenterol. 2004. Vol. 41. № 4. P. 229–233.
4. Lodge J.P. Assessment of hepatic reserve for the indication of hepatic resection: how I do it // J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2005. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 4–9.
5. Nagino M., Kamiya J., Uesaka K. et al. Complications of hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma // World J. Surg. 2001. Vol. 25. № 10. P. 1277–1283.
6. Singh A.K., Nachiappan A.C., Verma H.A. et al. Postoperative imaging in liver transplantation: what radiologists should know // Radiographics. 2010. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 339–351.
7. Benzoni E., Molaro R., Cedolini C. et al. Liver resection for HCC: analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications // Hepatogastroenterology. 2007. Vol. 54. № 73. P. 186–189.
8. Гудилина Е.А., Лепэдату П.И., Данзанова Т.Ю., Синюкова Г.Т. Холангиоцеллюлярный рак: актуальные вопросы современной ультразвуковой диагностики // Национальная ассоциация ученых, Ежемесячный научный журнал. 2015. №9 (14). Ч. 2. С. 115–119.
9. Vigano L., Ferrero A., Sgotto E. et al. Bile leak after hepatectomy: predictive factors of spontaneous healing // Amer. J. Surg. 2008. Vol. 196. № 2. P. 195–200.
10. Чардаров Н.К., Багмет Н.Н., Скипенко О.Г. Билиарные осложнения после резекций печени // Хирургия. 2010. № 8. С. 61–67.
11. Данзанова Т.Ю., Синюкова Г.Т., Гудилина Е.А. и соавт. Значение ультразвуковой диагностики метастатического поражения печени в определении тактики хирургического лечения // Российский онкологический журнал. 2015. №3. С. 23–27.
12. Huynh-Charlier I., Taboury J., Charlier P. et al. Imaging of the postsurgical liver // J. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 90. № 7–8. P. 888–904.
13. Тюрин И.Е., Долгушин Б.И., Холявка Е.Н. Компьютерная томография в диагностике неотложных состояний при онкологических заболеваниях // Вестник Московского онкологического общества. 2009. № 3. С. 4.
14. Ishii M., Mizuguchi T., Harada K. et al. Comprehensive review of post-liver resection surgical complications and a new universal classification and grading system // World J. Hepatol. 2014. Vol. 6. № 10. P. 745–751.
Review
For citations:
Danzanova T.Yu., Sinyukova G.T., Gudilina E.A., Sholohov V.N., Lepedatu P.I., Allahverdieva G.F., Kostyakova L.A., Berdnikov S.N. Tactics of Ultrasound Study in Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications after Hepatobillary Operations of Oncological Patients. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;1(3):39-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2018-1-3-39-43
Views:
496
Email this article 