Hyperechogenic Breast Malignant Formations: Modern Ultrasonic Diagnosis
T. Yu. Danzanova,
E. A. Gudilina,
G. T. Sinyukova,
E. A. Zubareva,
P. I. Lepedatu,
S. N. Berdnikov,
E. V. Tihonova,
E. V. Kovaleva,
I. V. Kolyadina https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2022-5-4-68-78
Abstract
The present review shows a modern view on the issues of differential ultrasound diagnosis of hyperechoic malignant tumors of the mammary glands. On clinical examples, the main ultrasonic semiotic signs of hyperechoic malignant structures were noted in comparison with the data of histopathological analysis.
About the Authors
T. Yu. Danzanova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24
117997, Moscow, Ostrovityanov str., 1
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
E. A. Gudilina
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
G. T. Sinyukova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
E. A. Zubareva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
117997, Moscow, Ostrovityanov str., 1
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
P. I. Lepedatu
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
S. N. Berdnikov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
E. V. Tihonova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
E. V. Kovaleva
LLC “PET-Technology”
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
143900, Moscow region, Balashikha, Karbyshev str., 6
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
I. V. Kolyadina
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
125993, Moscow, Barricadnaya str., 2/1, p. 1
Competing Interests:
Not declared.
References
1. Danzanova TYu, Sinyukova GT, Lepedatu PI, et al. A modern view at the differential ultrasound diagnosis of hyperechoic benign tumors of the breast. Tumors of Female Reproductive System. 2022;18(1):50-7. (In Russian). DOI:10.17650/1994-4098-2022-18-1-00-00
2. Kobayashi T, Shinozaki H, Yomon M, et al. Hyperechoic pattern in breast cancer--its bioacoustical genesis and tissue characterization. Journal of UOEH. 1989;11(2):181-7. DOI:10.7888/juoeh.11.181.
3. Adrada B, Wu Y, Yang W. Hyperechoic Lesions of the Breast: Radiologic-Histopathologic Correlation. Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(5):W518-W530. DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.9263
4. Wang XY, Cui LG, Huo L, et al. Hyperechoic Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Easily Misdiagnosed Conditions. Chinese. 2015;37(5):575-9. DOI:10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2015.05.014.
5. Kuba MG, Giess CS, Wieczorek TJ, Lester SC. Hyperechoic malignancies of the breast: Underlying pathologic features correlating with this unusual appearance on ultrasound. Breast J. 2020;26(4):643-52. DOI:10.1111/tbj.13501.
6. Nassar L, Issa G, Farah Z, et al. Predictors of Malignancy in Hyperechoic Breast Lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(4):783-90. DOI:10.7863/ultra.15.05020. Epub 2016 Mar 11. PMID:26969597.
7. Durmus T, Stöckel J, Slowinski T, et al. The hyperechoic zone around breast lesions an indirect parameter of malignancy. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2014;35(6):547-53. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1385342.
8. Li JK, Huan Fan Wang HW, He Y, et al. Ultrasonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 219 lesions. Gland Surgery. 2020;9(6):1945-54. DOI:10.21037/gs-20-428.
9. Kolyadina IV, Poddubnaya IV, Frank GA, et al. Stage I breast cancer heterogeneity: biological and predictive value. Malignant Tumors. 2015;(1):31-40 (In Russian). DOI:10.18027/2224-5057-2015-1-31-40
10. Tiang S, Metcalf C, Dissanayake D, Wylie E. Malignant hyperechoic breast lesions at ultrasound: A pictorial essay, 2016. DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.12468
11. Journo G, Bataillon G, Benchimol R, et al. Hyperechoic breast images: all that glitters is not gold! Insights into Imaging. 2018;(9):199-209. DOI:10.1007/s13244-017-0590-1.
12. Nikitina EA, Nechushkin MI, Trigolosov AV, et al. Paget’s disease of the breast (a review of literature). Tumors of the Female Reproductive System. 2016;12(4):37-45 (In Russian). DOI:10.17650/1994-4098-2016-12-4-37-46
13. Jones KN, Magut M, Henrichsen TL, et al. Pure lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as a hyperechoic mass: incidence and imaging characteristics. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):W765-9. DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.9742.
14. Zhang H, Qiu L, Peng Y. The sonographic findings of micropapillary pattern in pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;151(16). DOI:10.1186/s12957-018-1449-8
15. Picasso R, Pistoia F, Zaottini F, et al. Breast Metastases: Updates on Epidemiology and Radiologic Findings. Cureus. 2020;12(12):e12258. DOI:10.7759/cureus.12258.
16. Bitencourt AGV, Gama RRM, Graziano L, et al. Breast metastases from extramammary malignancies: multimodality imaging aspects. Br J Radiol. 2017;90(1077). DOI:10.1259/bjr.20170197.
17. Domchek SM, Hecht JL, Fleming MD, et al. Lymphomas of the breast: primary and secondary involvement. Cancer. 2002;94(1):6-13. DOI:10.1002/cncr.10163.
18. Kovaleva EV, Danzanova TYu, Sinyukova GT, et al. Successful experience in the use of ultrasound elastography in the differentiating of lymphomatous and metastatic superficial lymphadenopathy. Oncohematology. 2020;15(2):25-31 (In Russian). DOI:10.17650/1818-8346-2020-15-2-00-00.
19. Yang WT, Lane DL, Le-Petross HT, et al. Breast lymphoma: imaging findings of 32 tumors in 27 patients. Radiology. 2007;245(1):692-702. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2452061726.
20. Lyou CY, Yang SK, Choe DH, et al. Mammographic and sonographic findings of primary breast lymphoma. Clinical Imaging. 2007;31(4):234-8. DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.02.028.
21. Pavlikova OA, Poddubnaya IV, Kolyadina IV, et al. Clinical and radiological evaluation of the effectiveness of preoperative drug therapy in various biological subtypes of breast cancer stage T1-3N0-1M0. Modern Oncology. 2017;19(4):16-21. (In Russian).
22. Kolyadina IV, Komov DV, Poddubnaya IV, et al. Clinical semiotics and preoperative surgical diagnosis of stage I breast cancer. Russian Journal of Oncology. 2013;(4):17-20 (In Russian).
23. Kolyadina IV, Danzanova TYu, Khokhlova CV, et al. A modern view on the issues of diagnosis and verification of axillary lymph node lesions in early breast cancer. Modern Oncology. 2020;22(1):46-52 (In Russian).
24. Kolyadina IV, Ganshina IP, Zhukova LG, et al. Metastatic soft tissue lesion of the gluteal region in HER2+ breast cancer: description of a clinical case. Modern Oncology. 2017;19(4):36-8. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Danzanova T.Yu., Gudilina E.A., Sinyukova G.T., Zubareva E.A., Lepedatu P.I., Berdnikov S.N., Tihonova E.V., Kovaleva E.V., Kolyadina I.V. Hyperechogenic Breast Malignant Formations: Modern Ultrasonic Diagnosis. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2022;5(4):68-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2022-5-4-68-78
Views:
1153
Email this article 