Preview

Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

Flash-Effect in Radiotherapy of Tumors and the Problems of its Radiobiological Substantiation

https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2022-5-4-9-17

Abstract

The published data regarding radiation therapy of tumors treatment with ultrahigh dose rate radiation has been analyzed. In 2014, the authors, among whom the most mentioned are Vincent Favaudon and MarieCatherine Vozenin, named it the flash effect. Note, however, that a member of our laboratory, S.V. Kozin in the collaboration with ITEP researchers, back in 1984, having studied the reaction of a graft tumors and the mice skin after the proton irradiation with the ultrahigh and ordinary dose rates, concluded that: ‘... an increase in the radiation dose rate to ultrahigh, without significantly changing radiation reactions of tumors, leads to the protection of the mice skin, which is associated with the manifestation of the effect of radiation-chemical absorption of oxygen. Thus, under certain conditions of radiotherapy, one can expect to receive a therapeutic gain due to use the radiation with a high dose rate’. Consideration of the expediency and possibility of using a single irradiation with a dose rate of tens of Gy/s in radiation therapy of tumors is now given a special attention. It can be considered as established that less damage to the skin, lungs, intestines, and some other tissues occurs in this case in comparison with the usual dose rates used for the radiation therapy. Moreover, a number of studies indicate an increase in radiation damage to the tumors, or at least a much smaller decrease in the degree of their damage. The radiobiological mechanisms remain unclear. The effect itself is of undoubted clinical and experimental interest and justifies the conduct of experimental and clinical studies, as well as the need to take it into account when developing new equipment for radiation therapy and dosimetry accompanying the treatment process.

About the Authors

A. A. Wainson
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24


Competing Interests:

Not declared.



E. V. Solovieva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 24


Competing Interests:

Not declared.



References

1. Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V, et al. Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(245):245ra93. DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008973. PMID:25031268.

2. Erratum for the Research Article: "Ultrahigh doserate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice" by Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(523):eaba4525. DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.aba4525. PMID:3185279.

3. Favaudon V, Fouillade С, Vozenin М-С. Radiothérapie «flash» à très haut débit de dose: un moyen d’augmenter l’indice thérapeutique par minimisation des dommages aux tissus sains? Cancer Radiother. 2015;19(6-7):526-31. (In French). DOI:10.1016/j.canrad.2015.04.006.

4. Allen BD, Acharya MM, Montay-Gruel P, et al. Maintenance of tight junction integrity in the absence of vascular dilation in the brain of mice exposed to Ultra-High-dose-rate FLASH irradiation. Radiat Res. 2020;194(6):625-35. DOI:10.1667/RADE-20-00060.1. PMID:33348373.

5. Vozenin M-C, De Fornel P, Petersson K, Favaudon V. The advantage of FLASH radiotherapy confirmed in mini-pig and cat-cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(1):35-42. DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR17-3375.

6. Velalopoulou А, Gwendolyn M, Cramer GM, et al. FLASH proton radiotherapy spares normal epithelial and mesenchymal tissues while preserving sarcoma response. Cancer Res. 2021;81(18):4808-21. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1500.

7. Diffenderfer ES, Verginadis II, Kim MM, et al. Design, implementation, and in vivo validation of a novel proton FLASH radiation therapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106(2):440-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.049. PMID:31928642.

8. Soto LA, Casey KM, Wang J, et al. FLASH irradiation results in reduced severe skin toxicity compared to conventional-dose-rate irradiation. Radiat Res. 2020;194(6):618-24. DOI:10.1667/RADE-20-00090. PMID:32853385.

9. Sørensen BS, Sitarz MK, Ankjærgaard C, et al. In vivo validation and tissue sparing factor for acute damage of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH. Radiother Oncol. 2022;167:109-15. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.022.

10. Sørensen BS, Sitarz MK, Ankjærgaard C, et al. Pencil beam scanning proton FLASH maintains tumor control while normal tissue damage is reduced in a mouse model Radiother Oncol. 2022;175:178-84. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.014. PMID:35595175.

11. Bourhis J, Sozzi WJ, Jorge PG, et al. Treatment of a first patient with FLASH-radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2019;139:18-22. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.019.

12. https://scientificrussia.ru/articles/tags/sergejvsevolodovic-akulinicev

13. Friedl AA, Prise KM, Butterworth KT, et al. Radiobiology of the FLASH effect. Med Phys. 2022;49(3):1993-2013. DOI:10.1002/mp.15184.

14. Berry RJ, Hall EJ, Forster DW, et al. Survival of mammalian cells exposed to X rays at Ultrahigh dose-rates. Br J Radiol.1969;42(494):102-7. DOI:10.1259/0007-1285-42-494-102.

15. Berry RJ, Stedeford JBH. Reproductive survival of mammalian cells after irradiation at ultra-high doserates: Further observations and their importance for radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 1972;45(531):171-7. DOI:10.1259/0007-1285-45-531-171.

16. Weiss H, Epp ER, Heslin JM, et al. Oxygen depletion in cells irradiated at Ultra-high doserates and at conventional dose-rates. Int J Radiat Biol Related Stud Phys Chem Med. 1974;26(1):17-29. DOI:10.1080/09553007414550901.

17. Adrian G, Konradsson E, Beyer S, et al. Cancer cells can exhibit a sparing FLASH effect at low dose under normoxic in vitro conditions. Front Oncol 2021;11:686142. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.686142.

18. Hornsey S, Bewley DK. Hypoxia in mouse intestine induced by electron irradiation at high dose-rates. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1971;19(5):479-83. DOI:10.1080/09553007114550611.

19. Field SB, Bewley DK. Effects of dose-rate on the radiation response of rat skin. Int J Radiat Biol Related Stud Phys Chem Med.1974;26(3):259-67. DOI:10.1080/09553007414551221.

20. Yarmonenko SP, Magdon E, Wainson AA. Oxygen effect and radiotherapy of tumors. Moscow, 1980, 247 p. (In Russian).

21. Wainson AA. Oxybaro- and Hypoxyradiotherapy. Soviet Medical Reviews. Oncology Reviews v. 3, part. 5. 1991. Harwood Academic Publishers, UK. P.113-42.

22. Lin B, Huang D, Gao F, et al. Mechanisms of FLASH effect. Front Oncol. 2022;12:995612. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.995612. PMID:36212435.


Review

For citations:


Wainson A.A., Solovieva E.V. Flash-Effect in Radiotherapy of Tumors and the Problems of its Radiobiological Substantiation. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2022;5(4):9-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2022-5-4-9-17

Views: 494


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7593 (Print)
ISSN 2713-167X (Online)