Differential Diagnosis of a Solitary Bone Lesion Using SPECT/CT Method

Relevance: Radionuclide bone scan signs of lesions are not specific and require radiological identification. Hybrid tomographic technology is a combination of spatial distribution of radiopharmaceuticals and its anatomical binding. Thus, makes it possible to accurately identify the affected bone structure and also determine the nature of this changes (radiological anatomy). In cancer patients, SPECT/CT method allows to visualize tumor pathology in the bones, but also keeps to a minimum errors and other excessive examinations.

Purpose: To demonstrate the most frequent diseases and conditions that simulate tumor lesions in bones on bone scan.

Material and methods: We analyzed the results of examinations of 81 patients with various tumor diseases (2015–2020). Bone scan was performed in the whole body 3 hours later, after intravenous administration of 99mTc-phosphotech on a Symbia E, T2 (Siemens, Germany). SPECT/CT was performed after WB Bone Scan.

Results: The most frequent reasons for the focal increased uptake of radiopharmaceutical were: reactive increase in metabolism and as a result additional mineral repair: deforming osteoarthritis, osteophytes; post‑traumatic and postoperative changes; fractures (osteoporosis and stress fractures); inflammatory processes; focal uptake due to the benign neoplasms of bones and dysplasia. Combination of highly sensitive but non-specific scintigraphy with highly specific computed tomography makes it especially useful in anatomically difficult areas.

Conclusion: SPECT/CT reveals a direct pater of anatomical and structural abnormalities with changes in bone tissue metabolism in case of different injuries and minimizes a number of ambiguous conclusions. SPECT/CT in oncological practice greatly helps nuclear medicine physician in the differential diagnostic process and reduces time of examination for the patient. 

1. Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen W, et al. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(9):1723-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4.

2. Fogelman I. Bone Scanning In Clinical Practice. London: Springer-Verlag. 1987.

3. Fogelman I, Smith M. Diphosphonates in the evaluation of metabolic bone disease. Clin Rheumatol. 1982;1(1):41–4. DOI: 10.1007/bf02032475.

4. Coleman R, Body J, Aapro M, et al. Bone health in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:iii124-37. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu103.

5. Chang C, Gill C, Joseph Simeone F, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases. Acta Radiol. 2014;57(1):58-65. DOI: 10.1177/0284185114564438.

6. Löfgren J, Mortensen J, Rasmussen S, et al. A Prospective Study Comparing 99mTc-Hydroxyethylene-diphosphonate Planar Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body SPECT/CT with 18F-Fluoride PET/CT and 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI for Diagnosing Bone Metastases. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(11):1778- 85. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.189183.

7. Zhang Y, Shi H, Gu Y, et al. Differential diagnostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate in patients with spinal lesions. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32(12):1194-200. DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0b013e32834bd82e.

8. Zhang Y, Zhao C, Liu H, Hou H, Zhang H. Multiple Metastasis-Like Bone Lesions in Scintigraphic Imaging. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2012/957364.

9. Krzhivitsky PI, Kanaev SV, Novikov SN, et al. SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of metastatic skeletal lesion. Problems in Оncology. 22014;60(1):56-63. (In Russian).

10. Zhao Z, Zhou K, Liu B. Added Value of SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Sacral Fracture in Patients with Lung Cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(6):e195-e197. DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002082.

11. Sharma P, Kumar R, Singh H, et al. Indeterminate lesions on planar bone scintigraphy in lung cancer patients: SPECT, CT or SPECT-CT? Skeletal Radiol. 2011;41(7):843-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1304-2.

12. Krylov AS, Ryzhkov AD, Shchipakhina YA, et al. The Role of SPECT/CT and MRI in the Differential Diagnosis of Skeletal Damage (Case Report). Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(1):69-73. (In Russian). DOI: 10.12737/article_5c55fb5ef00a68.52703915.

13. Fournel L, Rapicetta C, Fraternali A, et al. Fibrous Dysplasia of the Rib Mimicking a Malignant Bone Tumor at SPECT/ CT with 99mTc-MDP. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(5):346–48. DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002015.

14. Krylov AS, Bludov AB, Ryzhkov AD, et al. SPECT/CT in the Diagnosis of Paget’s Disease (Case Report). Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017;62(3):78-83. (In Russian). DOI: 10.12737/article_5927fdaf3ad417.71072643.

15. Krylov AS, Shchipakhina YA, Fedorova AV, et al. Secondary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (Pierre Marie–Bamberger syndrome). Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2017;98(5):251-5. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-5-251-255.

16. Romer W, Nomayr A, Uder M, et al. SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(7):1102–06.

17. Willowson K, Bailey D, Baldock C. Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(12):3099-112. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/12/002.

18. Buck A, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, et al. SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(8):1305-19. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.050195.

19. Horger M, Eschmann S, Pfannenberg C, et al. Evaluation of Combined Transmission and Emission Tomography for Classification of Skeletal Lesions. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(3):655-61. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830655.

20. Nomayr A, Romer W, Strobel D, et al. Anatomical accuracy of hybrid SPECT/spiral CT in the lower spine. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27(6):521-28. DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200606000-00008.

21. Herzog R, Elgort D, Flanders A, et al. Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period. Spine Journal. 2017;17(4):554-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.11.009.

22. Kuwert T. Skeletal SPECT/CT: a review. Clin Transl Imaging. 2014;2(6):505-17. DOI: 10.1007/s40336-014-0090-y.

23. Kato S, Demura S, Matsubara H, et al. Utility of bone SPECT/ CT to identify the primary cause of pain in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1). DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1236-4.

24. Ha S, Hong S, Paeng J, et al. Comparison of SPECT/CT and MRI in Diagnosing Symptomatic Lesions in Ankle and Foot Pain Patients: Diagnostic Performance and Relation to Lesion Type. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117583.