Preview

Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

Results of Chemoradiotherapy for Nodal Follicular Lymphoma of the Abdominal Cavity and Pelvis. Report I. Immediate Effect, Local Progression-Free Survival and Progression-Free Survival

https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-2-84-89

Abstract

Relevance: The effectiveness of adjuvant radiation therapy used to consolidate the effect of chemotherapy in patients with malignant lymphomas remains a subject of debate and intensive study. The usefulness of chemoradiotherapy has been proven for certain lymphoma sites (mediastinum, central nervous system, bone, gonads), but its role in follicular lymphoma with primary involvement of the abdominal and/or pelvic lymph nodes has been insufficiently studied.

Purpose: Determination of the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy in primary patients with abdominal and pelvic nodal follicular lymphoma.

Materials and methods: We studied the immediate effect of treatment, 10-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 77 primary patients with follicular lymphoma of the abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes treated in 1985–2024 at the Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology. Chemoresistant patients were not included in the study. The main group (43 patients) underwent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with adjuvant irradiation of initially massive conglomerates of abdominal and/or pelvic lymph nodes, while the control group (34 patients) received chemotherapy alone. Identical chemotherapy regimens ± rituximab immunotherapy were used in both groups. The differences between the groups were statistically insignificant in terms of the main parameters that are potentially important for treatment outcomes.

Results: Upon completion of radiation therapy in the main group, the rate of complete remissions statistically significantly increased from 23 % to 49 % (p = 0.014). The 10-year LPFS rate was statistically significantly higher in the CRT group as a whole (80 % vs 30 %, p = 0.00006), as well as in all analyzed subgroups, except for the subgroups of patients with a lesion size of 7 cm or less and patients with complete remission after chemotherapy. The 10-year PFS rate was statistically significantly higher in the CRT group as a whole (49.6 % vs 14.2 %, p = 0.0017), as well as in most compared subgroups and did not reach statistical significance in men, patients over 60 years of age, at local stages of the disease, in the high-risk group, patients treated without rituximab and patients with complete remission after chemotherapy.

Conclusions: In primary patients with nodal follicular lymphoma of the abdominal and pelvic localization who are sensitive to chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy significantly compensates for the low efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in relation to massive tumor foci, which is expressed in a statistically significant increase in the proportion of complete remissions, a decrease in the initially high risk of subdiaphragmatic progression, and the achievement of a 10-year period free from disease progression in half of the patients.

About the Authors

V. M. Sotnikov
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation

Vladimir M. Sotnikov

86 Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997

+79165835585


Competing Interests:

Nikolay V. Nudnov is a member of the editorial council of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



N. V. Nudnov
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation

Nikolay V. Nudnov

86 Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997


Competing Interests:

Nikolay V. Nudnov is a member of the editorial council of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



A. V. Anan’ina
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation

Alina V. Anan’ina

86 Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997


Competing Interests:

Nikolay V. Nudnov is a member of the editorial council of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



References

1. Babicheva LG, Tumian GS, Kravchenko SK. Follicular lymphoma. Russian clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant lymphoproliferative diseases. Ed by Poddubnaya IV and Savchenko VG. Moscow, 2018: 43-52. (In Russ.).

2. Dreyling M, Ghielmini M, Rule S. Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Fol­licular Lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow‐Up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(3):298-308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.008.

3. Falaleeva NA. Follicular Lymphoma: Clinical and Immunopathogenetic Justification of Rational Therapy. Dis. doct. med. sciences. Moscow, 2017. 325 p. (In Russ.).

4. Ryabchikova VV. Optimization of the first line therapy for aggressive extranodal B-cell large cell lymphomas with primary involvement of the stomach or mediastinum. Dis. cand. med. sciences. St. Petersburg, 2024. 100 p. (In Russ.).

5. Casulo C, Day B, Dawson KL, et al. Disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of follicular lymphoma in patients 40 years of age and younger: an analysis from the National Lymphocare Study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(11):2311-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv375

6. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF. Recommendations for initial eval­uation, staging, and response assessment of hodgkin and non-hodg­kin lymphoma: the Lugano classification, Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(27):3059-3067. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.8800

7. McNamara C, Montoto S, Eyre TA. The Investigation and Management of Follicular Lymphoma. British Journal of Haematology. 2020;191(3): 363–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16872.

8. Bachy E, Seymour JF, Feugier P, et al. Sustained Progression‐Free Survival Benefit of Rituximab Maintenance in Patients with Follicu­lar Lymphoma: Long‐Term Results of the PRIMA Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019;37(31):2815-24. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.19.01073

9. Cheah CY, Chihara D, Ahmed M, et al. Factors influencing outcome in advanced stage, low-grade follicular lymphoma treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center in the rituximab era. Annals of Oncology. 2016;27(5):895-901. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw026.

10. Nesterova ES, Kravchenko SK, Gemdzhian EG, et al. The results of ten years experience treating patients with follicular lymphoma. Hematology and Transfusiology. 2012;57(5):3-8. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Sotnikov V.M., Nudnov N.V., Anan’ina A.V. Results of Chemoradiotherapy for Nodal Follicular Lymphoma of the Abdominal Cavity and Pelvis. Report I. Immediate Effect, Local Progression-Free Survival and Progression-Free Survival. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2026;9(2):84-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-2-84-89

Views: 45

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7593 (Print)
ISSN 2713-167X (Online)