Preview

Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

Flat-Detector Computed Tomography Technologies in Neuro-Oncology: The Experience of the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology

https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-2-72-83

Abstract

Relevance: The growing burden of central nervous system tumors increases the need for accurate and minimally invasive intraoperative imaging and navigation technologies. Flat-detector computed tomography (FDCT) provides volumetric and crossectional CT-imaging directly in the angiography suite and can be integrated with fluoroscopy and navigation.

Purpose: To assess the capabilities and principal applications of flat-detector computed tomography in neuro-oncology based on the experience of a single tertiary cancer center.

Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective descriptive analysis included 207 interventional procedures performed in 207 patients at the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology from November 2021 to December 2025. Procedures were carried out using an Artis Zee Floor angiographic system (Siemens). Statistical analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and STATISTICA 12.

Results: The median patient age was 58 years (45; 69); 95 patients were men and 112 were women. FDCT was used for stereotactic brain tumor biopsy (n = 159), diagnostic cerebral angiography (n = 14), drainage of tumor cysts (n = 11), Ommaya reservoir implantation (n = 7), ventriculoperitoneal shunting (n = 6), vertebroplasty (n = 5), drainage of brain abscesses (n = 3), and preoperative meningioma embolization (n = 2). The technology provided real-time intraoperative three-dimensional visualization, navigation planning, instrument position control, and immediate assessment of procedural results. The most convincing advantages were observed in stereotactic brain tumor biopsy.

Conclusions: FDCT is a promising universal intraoperative platform for minimally invasive neuro-oncological procedures. Its use may improve procedural accuracy, controllability, and safety, with the strongest current rationale seen for stereotactic brain tumor biopsy.

About the Authors

I. A. Kurnosov
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Kurnosov

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758

+7 (951) 651-44-56


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



P. V. Balakhnin
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology; Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Pavel V. Balakhnin

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758

2 Litovskaya Str., Saint Petersburg,194100


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



D. A. Gulyaev
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology; V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Gulyaev

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758

2 Akkuratov Str., Saint Petersburg,197341

47 Piskarevsky Prospekt, Saint Petersburg, 195067


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



M. D. Khanevich
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Mikhail D. Khanevich

2 Litovskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 194100


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



D. R. Subbotina
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Darya R. Subbotina

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



V. I. Malkevich
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Vasilii I. Malkevich

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



A. S. Shmelev
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Alexey S. Shmelev

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



D. S. Romashkina
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Daria S. Romashkina

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



N. V. Osipova
N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Nadezhda V. Osipova

68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758


Competing Interests:

Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



References

1. Price M, Ballard CAP, Benedetti JR, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2018-2022. Neuro Oncol. 2025;27(Suppl 4):iv1-iv66. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf194

2. Yuan G, Miao D, Xu B, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other central nervous system cancers from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2035: a systematic analysis for the global bur­den of disease study 2021. Int J Surg (Lond). 2025;112(1):286-302. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003497

3. Balakhnin PV, Bagnenko SS, Belyaev AM. Flat-detector computed tomography in interventional radiology: background and history of creation. High-Tech Medicine. 2024;2(1):12-34. (In Russ.).

4. Brown TCK. Neuroradiology investigations before scanning. Pae­diatr Anaesth. 2012;22(8):826-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03778.x

5. Kyriakou Y, Richter G, Dörfler A, et al. Neuroradiologic Applications with Routine C-arm Flat Panel Detector CT: Evaluation of Patient Dose Measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(10):1930-6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1237

6. Leeds NE, Kieffer SA. Evolution of Diagnostic Neuroradiology from 1904 to 1999. Radiology. 2000;217(2):309-18. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv45309

7. Tsibirov AA, Babichev KN, Martynov BV, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury. Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2026;(1). https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2601-07. (In Russ.).

8. Dhawan S, Chen CC. Comparison meta-analysis of intraoperative MRI-guided needle biopsy versus conventional stereotactic nee­dle biopsies. Neurooncol Adv. 2023;6(1):vdad129. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad129

9. Kurnosov IA, Balakhnin PV, Gulyaev DA, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography: advancing real-time neuronavigation for stereotactic brain tumor biopsy. Problems in Oncology. 2025;71(6):1245-59. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-6-OF-2310. (In Russ.).

10. Balakhnin PV, Tarazov PG, Tyurin IE, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography in interventional radiology: fundamental principles, modern technologies and prospects for further development. High‑Tech Medicine. 2025;3(2):5-37. (In Russ.).

11. Gulyaev DA, Belov IYu, Kurnosov IA, et al. Risks of embolization technologies in surgery for benign and malignant skull base tumors. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2025;24(2):150-161. https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-2-150-161. (In Russ.).

12. Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, et al. The utility of DynaCT in neuroend­ovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(2):330-332.

13. Fiorella D, Peeling L, Denice CM, et al. Integrated flat detector CT and live fluoroscopic-guided external ventricular drain placement with­in the neuroangiography suite. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(6):457. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010856

14. Kobayashi S, Ishikawa T, Mutoh T, et al. A novel technique for ven­triculoperitoneal shunting by flat panel detector CT-guided re­al-time fluoroscopy. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:119. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.102330

15. Krause M, Lagumdzija J, Enzinger S, et al. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography for catheter placement verifica­tion in pediatric hydrocephalus: technical note. Childs Nerv Syst. 2024;40(11):3813-3816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06592-5

16. Balakhnin PV, Burovik IA, Bagnenko SS. Technologies of visualization, guidance and tracking in interventional oncology: current capabilities and prospects for further development. High-Tech Medicine. 2024;2(2):5-21. (In Russ.).

17. Raz E, Nossek E, Sahlein DH, et al. Principles, techniques and appli­cations of high resolution cone beam CT angiography in the neu­roangio suite. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023;15(6):600-607. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2022-018722

18. Yoshida K, Akiyama T, Takahashi S, et al. Cone-Beam Computed To­mography Fusion Technique for Vascular Assessment of Skull Base Meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2021;151:61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.065


Review

For citations:


Kurnosov I.A., Balakhnin P.V., Gulyaev D.A., Khanevich M.D., Subbotina D.R., Malkevich V.I., Shmelev A.S., Romashkina D.S., Osipova N.V. Flat-Detector Computed Tomography Technologies in Neuro-Oncology: The Experience of the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2026;9(2):72-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-2-72-83

Views: 66

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7593 (Print)
ISSN 2713-167X (Online)