Flat-Detector Computed Tomography Technologies in Neuro-Oncology: The Experience of the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology
https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-2-72-83
Abstract
Relevance: The growing burden of central nervous system tumors increases the need for accurate and minimally invasive intraoperative imaging and navigation technologies. Flat-detector computed tomography (FDCT) provides volumetric and crossectional CT-imaging directly in the angiography suite and can be integrated with fluoroscopy and navigation.
Purpose: To assess the capabilities and principal applications of flat-detector computed tomography in neuro-oncology based on the experience of a single tertiary cancer center.
Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective descriptive analysis included 207 interventional procedures performed in 207 patients at the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology from November 2021 to December 2025. Procedures were carried out using an Artis Zee Floor angiographic system (Siemens). Statistical analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and STATISTICA 12.
Results: The median patient age was 58 years (45; 69); 95 patients were men and 112 were women. FDCT was used for stereotactic brain tumor biopsy (n = 159), diagnostic cerebral angiography (n = 14), drainage of tumor cysts (n = 11), Ommaya reservoir implantation (n = 7), ventriculoperitoneal shunting (n = 6), vertebroplasty (n = 5), drainage of brain abscesses (n = 3), and preoperative meningioma embolization (n = 2). The technology provided real-time intraoperative three-dimensional visualization, navigation planning, instrument position control, and immediate assessment of procedural results. The most convincing advantages were observed in stereotactic brain tumor biopsy.
Conclusions: FDCT is a promising universal intraoperative platform for minimally invasive neuro-oncological procedures. Its use may improve procedural accuracy, controllability, and safety, with the strongest current rationale seen for stereotactic brain tumor biopsy.
About the Authors
I. A. KurnosovRussian Federation
Ivan A. Kurnosov
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
+7 (951) 651-44-56
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
P. V. Balakhnin
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Balakhnin
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
2 Litovskaya Str., Saint Petersburg,194100
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
D. A. Gulyaev
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Gulyaev
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
2 Akkuratov Str., Saint Petersburg,197341
47 Piskarevsky Prospekt, Saint Petersburg, 195067
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
M. D. Khanevich
Russian Federation
Mikhail D. Khanevich
2 Litovskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 194100
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
D. R. Subbotina
Russian Federation
Darya R. Subbotina
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
V. I. Malkevich
Russian Federation
Vasilii I. Malkevich
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
A. S. Shmelev
Russian Federation
Alexey S. Shmelev
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
D. S. Romashkina
Russian Federation
Daria S. Romashkina
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
N. V. Osipova
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Osipova
68 Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint Petersburg, 197758
Competing Interests:
Pavel V. Balakhnin is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.
References
1. Price M, Ballard CAP, Benedetti JR, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2018-2022. Neuro Oncol. 2025;27(Suppl 4):iv1-iv66. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf194
2. Yuan G, Miao D, Xu B, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other central nervous system cancers from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2035: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Int J Surg (Lond). 2025;112(1):286-302. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003497
3. Balakhnin PV, Bagnenko SS, Belyaev AM. Flat-detector computed tomography in interventional radiology: background and history of creation. High-Tech Medicine. 2024;2(1):12-34. (In Russ.).
4. Brown TCK. Neuroradiology investigations before scanning. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(8):826-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03778.x
5. Kyriakou Y, Richter G, Dörfler A, et al. Neuroradiologic Applications with Routine C-arm Flat Panel Detector CT: Evaluation of Patient Dose Measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(10):1930-6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1237
6. Leeds NE, Kieffer SA. Evolution of Diagnostic Neuroradiology from 1904 to 1999. Radiology. 2000;217(2):309-18. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv45309
7. Tsibirov AA, Babichev KN, Martynov BV, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury. Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2026;(1). https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2601-07. (In Russ.).
8. Dhawan S, Chen CC. Comparison meta-analysis of intraoperative MRI-guided needle biopsy versus conventional stereotactic needle biopsies. Neurooncol Adv. 2023;6(1):vdad129. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad129
9. Kurnosov IA, Balakhnin PV, Gulyaev DA, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography: advancing real-time neuronavigation for stereotactic brain tumor biopsy. Problems in Oncology. 2025;71(6):1245-59. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-6-OF-2310. (In Russ.).
10. Balakhnin PV, Tarazov PG, Tyurin IE, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography in interventional radiology: fundamental principles, modern technologies and prospects for further development. High‑Tech Medicine. 2025;3(2):5-37. (In Russ.).
11. Gulyaev DA, Belov IYu, Kurnosov IA, et al. Risks of embolization technologies in surgery for benign and malignant skull base tumors. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2025;24(2):150-161. https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-2-150-161. (In Russ.).
12. Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, et al. The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(2):330-332.
13. Fiorella D, Peeling L, Denice CM, et al. Integrated flat detector CT and live fluoroscopic-guided external ventricular drain placement within the neuroangiography suite. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(6):457. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010856
14. Kobayashi S, Ishikawa T, Mutoh T, et al. A novel technique for ventriculoperitoneal shunting by flat panel detector CT-guided real-time fluoroscopy. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:119. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.102330
15. Krause M, Lagumdzija J, Enzinger S, et al. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography for catheter placement verification in pediatric hydrocephalus: technical note. Childs Nerv Syst. 2024;40(11):3813-3816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06592-5
16. Balakhnin PV, Burovik IA, Bagnenko SS. Technologies of visualization, guidance and tracking in interventional oncology: current capabilities and prospects for further development. High-Tech Medicine. 2024;2(2):5-21. (In Russ.).
17. Raz E, Nossek E, Sahlein DH, et al. Principles, techniques and applications of high resolution cone beam CT angiography in the neuroangio suite. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023;15(6):600-607. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2022-018722
18. Yoshida K, Akiyama T, Takahashi S, et al. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Fusion Technique for Vascular Assessment of Skull Base Meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2021;151:61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.065
Review
For citations:
Kurnosov I.A., Balakhnin P.V., Gulyaev D.A., Khanevich M.D., Subbotina D.R., Malkevich V.I., Shmelev A.S., Romashkina D.S., Osipova N.V. Flat-Detector Computed Tomography Technologies in Neuro-Oncology: The Experience of the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2026;9(2):72-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-2-72-83
JATS XML























