Preview

Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

Diagnostic Yield of Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using Small-Diameter Needles in Tumor Lesions of the Liver, Pancreas, and Lymph Nodes: a Clinical-Experimental Study.

https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-1-69-76

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic informativeness and clinical efficiency of vacuum-assisted fine-needle aspiration biopsy (v-FNA) under ultrasound guidance in liver, pancreatic, and lymph node tumors, and to assess the feasibility of using small-diameter needles (20–25G) without compromising diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods: The study included 62 patients (32 men, 30 women) with suspected neoplastic lesions of the liver, pancreas, and lymph nodes. A total of 76 biopsies were performed under real-time ultrasound guidance using Chiba needles (20G, 22G, and 25G). Vacuum aspiration was performed under a constant negative pressure of −0.8 bar. Cytological preparations were stained by the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method and evaluated according to the WHO Classification of Tumours (5th Edition, 2022). Results: The overall rate of diagnostically adequate smears increased from 72.3 % with FNA to 89.5 % with v-FNA. The greatest improvement was observed in pancreatic and lymph node biopsies. Small-diameter needles (25G) yielded sufficient cellular material for reliable cytological diagnosis with minimal trauma. Concordance between cytological and histological diagnoses reached 85.7 %. Conclusions: Vacuum-assisted fine-needle aspiration biopsy under ultrasound control is a reliable, safe, and reproducible method of cytological diagnosis for intra-abdominal tumors. The use of controlled negative pressure allows for smaller needles without loss of   diagnostic yield, expanding clinical applicability and improving the overall quality of cytological evaluation.

About the Authors

A. O. Tagil
Smolensk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Problem Research Laboratory “Diagnostic Studies and Minimally Invasive Technologies”

40 Frunze Str., Smolensk, 214006


Competing Interests:

Aleksey V. Borsukov is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



A. V. Borsukov
Smolensk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Problem Research Laboratory “Diagnostic Studies and Minimally Invasive Technologies”

40 Frunze Str., Smolensk, 214006


Competing Interests:

Aleksey V. Borsukov is a member of the editorial board of the journal “Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy” but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors have declared no other conflicts of interest.



References

1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. Lyon: IARC; 2022. (Series: IAC-IARC-WHO Cytopathology Reporting Systems, Vol. 2). ISBN 978-92 832-4518-6. Available from: https://publications.iarc.who.int/Book-And-Report-Series/Iac-Iarc-Who-Cytopathology-Reporting-Systems/WHO-Reporting-System-For-Pancreaticobiliary-Cytopathology-2022.

2. International Academy of Cytology; International Agency for Research on Cancer; World Health Organization. WHO Reporting System for Lymph Node, Spleen and Thymus Cytopathology. Lyon: IARC; 2024. (Series: IAC-IARC-WHO Cytopathology Reporting Systems, Vol. 3). ISBN 978-92-832-4522-3. Available from: https://publications.iarc.who.int/Book-And-Report-Series/Iac-Iarc-Who-Cytopathology-Reporting-Systems/WHO-Reporting-System-For-Lymph-Node-Spleen-And-Thymus-Cytopathology-2024.

3. Al-Abbadi MA. Basics of cytology. Avicenna J Med. 2011;1(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0770.83719.

4. Smetanina SV. Specific features of differential cytological diagnosis of primary and metastatic liver carcinomas. Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2021;66(6):364-370. (In Russ.)

5. Courtman N, Quilez E. Cytologic evaluation of the liver. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2025;55(4):539-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2025.03.005. PMID: 40360339.

6. Muthusamy VR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration vs fine-needle biopsy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13(8):496-9.

7. Sibinga Mulder BG, Mieog JS, Handgraaf HJ, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing of FNA-derived DNA in pancreatic cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70(2):174-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203928. PMID: 27672215.

8. Altinkaya E, Akay E, Koc A, Caglar E. EUS-FNA biopsy for pancreatic mass. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024;34(7):832-7. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.07.832. PMID: 38978250.

9. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Machicado JD, Sheth SG, Chalhoub JM, et al.; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of solid pancreatic masses: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;100(5):786-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.002. PMID: 39387777.

10. Dvoinikova ER, Stegniy KV, Goncharuk RA, Agapov MYu. Comparative evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic diseases. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2018;(1):10-4. (In Russ.)

11. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines rubricator. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/1_4 (accessed: 19.10.2025). (In Russ.)

12. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Pancreatic cancer: Clinical guidelines. ID 355_5. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/355_5 (accessed: 19.10.2025). (In Russ.)

13. Glukhova YuK, Volchenko NN, Borisova OV. ROSE diagnosis of EUS guided FNA material from pancreatic lesions: A literature review. News of Clinical Cytology of Russia. 2024;(4). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rose-diagnostika-materiala-tonkoigolnyh-aspiratsionnyh-punktsionnyh-biopsiy-obrazovaniy-podzheludochnoy-zhelezy-poluchennyh-pod (accessed: 19.10.2025). (In Russ.)

14. Tagil AO, Borsukov AV. Device for performing vacuum fine-needle aspiration biopsy under ultrasound guidance. Patent RF №2757525 C1. 2021. (In Russ.)

15. Tagil AO, Borsukov AV. Method for increasing the amount of tissue and cytological material during vacuum aspiration biopsy. Patent RF №2770783 C1. 2022. (In Russ.)

16.


Review

For citations:


Tagil A.O., Borsukov A.V. Diagnostic Yield of Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using Small-Diameter Needles in Tumor Lesions of the Liver, Pancreas, and Lymph Nodes: a Clinical-Experimental Study. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2026;9(1):69-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2026-9-1-69-76

Views: 165

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7593 (Print)
ISSN 2713-167X (Online)