Ultrasound Examination after Oncological Operations: Unexpected Findings. Clinical Cases
T. Yu. Danzanova,
E. A. Gudilina,
S. N. Berdnikov,
G. T. Sinyukova,
P. I. Lepedatu,
E. A. Zubareva,
A. Yu. Vasenina https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2024-7-3-48-53
Abstract
The first clinical case describes the main ultrasound signs of a foreign body in the form of suture material after surgery on the stomach, the second clinical case presents the ultrasound signs of an installed intraperitoneal port for chemotherapy after extirpation of the uterus and appendages. The article compares the types of intraoperative foreign bodies, the clinical picture, and the main diagnostic methods.
About the Authors
T. Yu. Danzanova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Tatiana Yu. Danzanova
4 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
1 Ostrovityanov Str., Moscow, 117997
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. A. Gudilina
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Elena A. Gudilina
4 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. N. Berdnikov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Berdnikov
4 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
G. T. Sinyukova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Galina T. Sinyukova
4 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
P. I. Lepedatu
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Pavel I. Lepedatu
4 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. A. Zubareva
N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Elena A. Zubareva
1 Ostrovityanov Str., Moscow, 117997
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. Yu. Vasenina
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Aleksandra Yu. Vasenina
4 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Papelnitski SV. Provision of surgical safety based on standardization of processes and procedures in a medical organization. Siberian Medical Review. 2023;(1):6-10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-946.
2. Mingalimova EYu, Zinchenko SV, Khasanov RSh, et al. On the issue of early postoperative complications in a multidisciplinary oncology hospital (literature review). Privolzhsky Oncological Bulletin. 2022;13(1). (In Russ.).
3. Stawicki SPA, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Ahmed HM, et al. Retained Surgical Items: A Problem Yet to Be Solved. J AmColl Surg., 2013;216:15-22. PMID: 23041050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.026.
4. Elsharydah A, Warmack KO, Minhajuddin A, et al. Retained‑surgical items after abdominal and pelvic surgery: Incidence, trend and predictors — observational study. Ann Med Surg (Lond)., 2016;12:60-64. PMID: 27895909. PMCID: PMC5121141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.11.006.
5. Ognerubov NA, Antipova TS. Peculiarities of PET/CT diagnostics of gossypibom. Tambov University reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences. 2017;22(6):1431-6. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-6-1431-1436.
6. Kumar GVS, Ramani S, Mahajan A, et al. Imaging of retained surgical items: A pictorial review including new innovations. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2017;27:354-61. PMID: 29089689. PMаD: PMC5644334. https://doi.org/ё10.4103/ijri.IJRI_31_17.
7. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, et al. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:229-35. PMID: 12529464. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021721.
8. Szymocha M, Pacan M, Anufrowicz M, et al. Leaving a foreign object in the body of a patient during abdominal surgery: still a current problem. Pol Przegl Chir. 2019 May 15;91(6):35-40. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2024.
9. Birolini DV, Rasslan S, Utiyama EM: Unintentionally retained foreign bodies after surgical procedures. Analysis of 4547 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016;43:12-7. PMID: 27096851. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016001004.
10. Zarenezhad M, Gholamzadeh S, Hedjazi A, et al. Three years evaluation of retained foreign bodies after surgery in Iran. Ann Med Surg. 2017;15:22-5. PMID: 28217303. PMCID: PMC5302138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.019.
11. Erol C, Koplay M, Paksoy Y, et al. Case Series: Pericardial gossypibomas detected after cardiovascular surgery: Imaging findings. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012;22:276-8. PMID: 23833418. PMCID: PMC3698889. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.111479.
12. Pons Y, Schouman T. Maxillary sinus textiloma: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2010;4:288. PMID: 20735833. PMCID: PMC2936320. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-4-288.
13. Nobre LF, Marchiori E, May F, et al. Thoracic textilomas after myocardial revascularisation: typical CT findings. Br J Radiol. 2010;985:4-7. PMID: 19433481. PMCID: PMC3487248. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/68800282.
14. Rijken M, van Overbeeke AJ, Staaks G. Gossypiboma in a man with persistent cough. Thorax, 2005;60:708. PMID: 16061721. PMCID: PMC1747485. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2004.035659.
15. O’Connor AR, Coakley FV, Meng MV, et al. Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:481-9. PMID: 12540456. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800481.
16. Lu YY, Cheung YC, Ko SF, Ng SH. Calcified reticulate rind sign: A characteristic feature of gossypiboma on computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;31:4927-9. PMID: 16097075. PMCID: PMC4398753. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4927.
17. Kastiunig Th, Sortino R, Clea Vines L, et al. Intraabdominal foreign body as unexpected discovery mimicking suspicious malignancy. J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Jun; 2021(6):rjab248. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab248.
18. Danzanova TYu, Sinyukova GT, Gudilina EA, et al. Tactics of Ultrasound Study in Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications after Hepatobillary Operations of Oncological Patients. Oncological journal. 2018;1(3):39-43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2023-6-2-95-100.
19. Danzanova TYu, Sinyukova GT, Lepedatu PI, et al. ossibilities of intraoperative ultrasound in oncohepatology. Ultrasound and functional diagnostics. 2015;4S:48а. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Danzanova T.Yu., Gudilina E.A., Berdnikov S.N., Sinyukova G.T., Lepedatu P.I., Zubareva E.A., Vasenina A.Yu. Ultrasound Examination after Oncological Operations: Unexpected Findings. Clinical Cases. Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2024;7(3):48-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2024-7-3-48-53
Views:
175
Email this article 